And given that NVIDIA owns ARM now, there should be some much tighter and more optimised GPU integration in the future, too. It’s very exciting to see what will come in the future from Apple, but with ARM-based Windows finally getting x86 64-Bit emulation Windows might be able to catch up on performance per dollar. I still can’t see myself switching over to Apple just yet. But a chart with numbers only tells you so much.
It was interesting to see a real-world comparison like this. There has been so much written about the technical specs and raw performance of Apple’s M1, particularly as compared to its Intel-based Mac counterparts but also Intel-based Windows PCs that it’s enough to make your head spin. Surprisingly, the M1 actually seemed to perform quite well, if you put all the settings sliders down to “Potato”. They also did some stuff with gaming, if that’s your thing. Performing the same edits as Resolve, there was no slowdown at all scrubbing through the timeline and the final render came out at 47 seconds – faster than DaVinci Resolve on either system.
#Whatsapp for mac m1 pro
What was impressive, and an area where the M1 won by default because it’s not available on the PC, was Final Cut Pro performance. The M1 iMac wasn’t far behind though, at a minute and 4 seconds. WhatsApp has no means to delete stuff that already has been exported to other locations like Apple’s.
#Whatsapp for mac m1 Pc
The Intel PC managed it in a very speedy 56 seconds. M1 M1 Pro M1 Max Apple Silicon macOS Monterey macOS Big Sur MacBook Pro MacBook Air iMac. There were some noticeable performance slowdowns with both systems, but neither really performed any worse than the other.įor rendering a 30-second clip containing two 5.9K 24fps 10-bit 4:2:0 files, sampled down to 4K 24fps H.264 was sent to both machines and they were left to render. To put them to the test, though, they threw some 5.9K 24fps, 10-bit 4:2:0 footage from the Panasonic S1H at them with some multitrack picture-in-picture. They didn’t test Premiere Pro, because apparently, they’re not big fans of Premiere Pro. When it comes to video, DaVinci Resolve was the main comparison between the two. Obviously, in these first couple of examples, Lightroom is optimised more for Intel-based systems while Capture One’s M1 optimisation is very impressive.
#Whatsapp for mac m1 full
These changes, along with the other tweaks and fixes, are listed in the full changelog. Type your custom shortcut next to the feature. Click the three-dot icon next to the feature and select Configure shortcuts. I think this lends itself well to demonstrating how well optimised certain applications are for specific platforms. To set custom keyboard shortcuts for your favorite features: Click the three-dot icon at the bottom of your sidebar. When it came to Capture One, though, the results were a little closer. It was basically twice as fast (which you’d expect if you’re paying twice as much). But is it? The Windows laptop hammered the M1 desktop in the Lightroom test. With that massive price difference, it seems a bit of an unfair comparison, really. It’s half the price of Chris’ laptop, at $1,699 and features an 8-core M1, 16GB RAM and a 256GB SSD. Coming in at $3,499 (although it’s currently available for $2,999), it’s not an inexpensive machine, by any stretch of the imagination. Jordan’s 24″ M1 iMac, on the other hand, is significantly less expensive. Chris’ PC in this case is the Gigabyte Aero 15 YB, with an 11th Gen Intel i9 CPU, 32GB RAM and NVIDIA RTX 3080 GPU with 8GB RAM.